Business divorces entail a breakdown of trust between the parties, which is an obstacle to reaching a resolution. To overcome that challenge, I work to identify what will truly serve my client’s overall interests and the best process for achieving it."
When business partnerships, startups, and investment funds are in the throes of intra-company disputes or face claims of wrongdoing, business litigator John D. Pernick guides companies and their founders, directors, executives, and investors toward resolutions that serve their overall interests, be it through negotiation or litigation. He also represents companies and individuals in complex state and federal litigation matters and in connection with investigations by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and other regulatory agencies and authorities.
Business Breakups and Complex Disputes
John has more than 25 years of experience representing a range of clients, from Silicon Valley and Bay Area startups to Fortune 50 corporations, in complex business litigation in state and federal courts.
John leverages his background in corporate governance and corporate control fights to add expediency and efficiency to the litigation process. He aims to lessen the burden and disruption of litigation for emerging and growth companies while still obtaining optimal results. John's practice scope includes:
Attuned to Silicon Valley Business Economics
John's clients include a cross-section of Silicon Valley's technology, software, and financial companies as well as manufacturers, online retailers and participants in emerging industries, such as cryptocurrency and cannabis.
In building a client's case, John digs deep into underlying business issues. He examines what should have happened to make the business prosper and actions, governance practices, and structural deficiencies that led to the dispute.
His representative experience includes defending venture capital firms and their partners in actions claiming breach of fiduciary duties in connection with portfolio company refinancings. He has also led
tech company CEOs in company and shareholder disputes, and he has steered Chief Compliance Officers in proceedings before the DOJ, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and other agencies.
Leadership in Business Litigation and Trials
Recognized by such top legal guides as Chambers USA, Legal 500, Super Lawyers, and America’s Top 100 Attorneys®, John serves on the Board of Governors of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers, Northern California Chapter. In addition, he is a member of the Executive Committee of the Securities Litigation Section of The Bar Association of San Francisco.
Out of the office, John is an accomplished competitive sailor who was a member of the crew that won the 2017 J/111 World Championship and 2018 J/111 North American Championship titles.
Corporate Governance and Complex Commercial Litigation
Kerrigan Capital, LLC v. Strohm, Atinar Capital II v. Alvarez
Represented venture capital firms and their partners in actions claiming breach of fiduciary duties in connection with portfolio company refinancings.
Mehta v. Kaazing, Inc., Mehta v. McManus
Represented an internet communications technology company in actions brought by the former CEO alleging breaches of fiduciary duty by company directors and officers.
Gilmore v. Turvo, Inc.
Represented a software company founder/CEO in an action to overturn wrongful removal.
Magic Link Garment Ltd. v. ThirdLove, Inc.
Represented an online clothing retailer in an action against a clothing manufacturer for damages relating to defective products.
Miller v. Oster
Represented technology company co-founders in an action brought by a shareholder alleging breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with company financings.
V Shapes Moulders, Ltd. v. ThirdLove, Inc.
Represented an online clothing retailer in an action brought by its component supplier alleging breach of confidentiality agreement.
Jessica Geis v. Paradigm Counsel, LLC
Represented a tech-focused investment bank in an action brought by a former client alleging breach of contract and negligence.
89 Acapulco, LLC. v. David Elias
Represented an investor in a cannabis-focused investment fund in an action against a fund manager and business associates for breaches of fiduciary duty.
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. Rolen Stockholder Representative, Inc.
Represented selling company shareholders in dispute over merger agreement escrow provisions.
Securities Litigation and Regulatory Actions
UCBH Holdings, Inc.
Represented a bank Chief Compliance Officer in FDIC and DOJ proceedings and securities actions concerning allegedly fraudulent regulatory filings.
In re Micro Focus International PLC Securities Litigation
Represented a technology company CEO in a securities class action alleging misrepresentations in securities offering registration materials and other public statements.
In re Tintri, Inc. Securities Litigation
Represented officers and directors of an enterprise cloud platform company in a securities class action and other proceedings.
Co-author: The chapter “Getting Underway and Closing the Deal” in the Financial Services Mediation Answer Book (July 2017).
Co-author: “Testing and Attacking Confidential Witness Allegations at an Early Stage,” American Bar Association Section of Litigation, Securities Litigation Winter Newsletter (March 20, 2014).
Co-author: “No Free Lunch: Court Scrutinizes Coughlin Stoia’s Free “Monitoring” of Client Investments,” Bingham.com (June 9, 2009).
Co-author: “Two Federal District Courts in California Dismiss Stock Option Backdating Derivative Actions for Failure to Adequately Plead Demand Futility,” Bingham.com (May 2007).
Author: “Protecting Online Databases: Copyright? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Copyright,” Cyberspace Lawyer.
Author: “Viruses, Hackers and Outages: Who Pays?,” Cyber Tech Litigation Report (June 2000).